1 00:00:14,539 --> 00:00:10,820 alright so as I mentioned this is the 2 00:00:16,460 --> 00:00:14,549 last of our two talks for planetary 3 00:00:18,470 --> 00:00:16,470 atmospheres I expect to see more next 4 00:00:20,600 --> 00:00:18,480 year guys seriously planetary 5 00:00:23,509 --> 00:00:20,610 atmospheres are awesome what I want to 6 00:00:26,859 --> 00:00:23,519 talk to you today about is mostly 7 00:00:29,689 --> 00:00:26,869 looking for life around other stars and 8 00:00:32,990 --> 00:00:29,699 one of the best ways that we can do that 9 00:00:36,619 --> 00:00:33,000 is by using the earth as an analog and 10 00:00:38,900 --> 00:00:36,629 so the big picture here is that we have 11 00:00:41,030 --> 00:00:38,910 this big blue ball and we know that 12 00:00:42,680 --> 00:00:41,040 there's life on it conveniently 13 00:00:45,590 --> 00:00:42,690 otherwise there would be no one here to 14 00:00:48,020 --> 00:00:45,600 listen to me talk now we can use the 15 00:00:50,720 --> 00:00:48,030 earth as a proxy by saying that life is 16 00:00:53,389 --> 00:00:50,730 here and we can see the signs for Life 17 00:00:54,760 --> 00:00:53,399 all around us and we want to do is we 18 00:00:57,200 --> 00:00:54,770 want to take those signs for life and 19 00:01:01,340 --> 00:00:57,210 extrapolate them to other places in the 20 00:01:04,310 --> 00:01:01,350 universe especially when what we're 21 00:01:06,680 --> 00:01:04,320 looking at is just the size of a pixel 22 00:01:08,870 --> 00:01:06,690 so looking for terrestrial planets 23 00:01:10,550 --> 00:01:08,880 around other stars this is about as much 24 00:01:12,620 --> 00:01:10,560 information as we're going to have any 25 00:01:15,380 --> 00:01:12,630 time in the next hundred years until we 26 00:01:19,100 --> 00:01:15,390 build some solar system size telescope 27 00:01:22,010 --> 00:01:19,110 to resolve these terrestrial planets now 28 00:01:24,529 --> 00:01:22,020 one of the biggest bio signatures in the 29 00:01:26,600 --> 00:01:24,539 terrestrial system is the oxygen that we 30 00:01:29,089 --> 00:01:26,610 are breathing now it is predominantly 31 00:01:32,449 --> 00:01:29,099 formed by biology on the present earth 32 00:01:36,020 --> 00:01:32,459 and oxygen has been suggested as a bio 33 00:01:38,600 --> 00:01:36,030 signature for basically 50 years at this 34 00:01:39,949 --> 00:01:38,610 point and attendance Upton's ups and 35 00:01:42,680 --> 00:01:39,959 downs there have been some suggestion 36 00:01:48,320 --> 00:01:42,690 that oxygen could have other abiotic 37 00:01:51,589 --> 00:01:48,330 sources but oxygen is wonderful because 38 00:01:54,380 --> 00:01:51,599 it has this big feature here at point 39 00:01:56,960 --> 00:01:54,390 seven six microns that is a pretty deep 40 00:01:59,570 --> 00:01:56,970 and we could see that so oxygen is 41 00:02:01,999 --> 00:01:59,580 visible at about greater than 1% the 42 00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:02,009 present atmospheric level so you can see 43 00:02:07,249 --> 00:02:05,610 this is 21% oxygen 1pl and as you 44 00:02:09,859 --> 00:02:07,259 decrease oxygen that feature kind of 45 00:02:12,290 --> 00:02:09,869 goes away now the nice thing is at low 46 00:02:14,600 --> 00:02:12,300 oxygen concentrations ozone which is a 47 00:02:17,030 --> 00:02:14,610 photo chemical byproduct of oxygen still 48 00:02:19,490 --> 00:02:17,040 stays visible so about point one percent 49 00:02:22,250 --> 00:02:19,500 PL o to you have a pretty 50 00:02:24,620 --> 00:02:22,260 a substantial ozone feature out in the 51 00:02:27,940 --> 00:02:24,630 infrared and so this is how we might 52 00:02:31,100 --> 00:02:27,950 detect oxygen in a planetary atmosphere 53 00:02:34,280 --> 00:02:31,110 now like I mentioned for some of the 54 00:02:35,990 --> 00:02:34,290 sources for oxygen we have transient 55 00:02:38,180 --> 00:02:36,000 sources in the present Earth's 56 00:02:41,210 --> 00:02:38,190 atmosphere including lightning so if you 57 00:02:44,270 --> 00:02:41,220 take some water and co2 nitrogen add a 58 00:02:47,360 --> 00:02:44,280 bunch of electricity you get n 0 and 0 2 59 00:02:48,830 --> 00:02:47,370 and some hydrogen or co this is 60 00:02:51,170 --> 00:02:48,840 remarkably short lived because that 61 00:02:54,110 --> 00:02:51,180 oxygen goes back to recombine with n 0 62 00:02:56,870 --> 00:02:54,120 or with h2 so it goes away fairly 63 00:02:58,910 --> 00:02:56,880 quickly another transient source is 64 00:03:00,860 --> 00:02:58,920 through co2 fatalis is for example in 65 00:03:03,410 --> 00:03:00,870 the upper atmosphere of the earth you 66 00:03:04,940 --> 00:03:03,420 can break apart co2 that loan oxygen 67 00:03:08,060 --> 00:03:04,950 goes off and finds itself a dance 68 00:03:10,580 --> 00:03:08,070 partner and makes 02 which could linger 69 00:03:15,500 --> 00:03:10,590 in the upper atmosphere more 70 00:03:17,930 --> 00:03:15,510 persistently however we have life which 71 00:03:19,930 --> 00:03:17,940 takes water in co2 and makes organic 72 00:03:22,280 --> 00:03:19,940 carbon which is buried in sediments and 73 00:03:25,400 --> 00:03:22,290 gaseous co2 which is allowed to 74 00:03:28,039 --> 00:03:25,410 accumulate in the atmosphere or through 75 00:03:30,440 --> 00:03:28,049 hydrogen loss so for example early Venus 76 00:03:33,080 --> 00:03:30,450 it probably lost most of its oceans 77 00:03:35,600 --> 00:03:33,090 through the Potala seas and subsequent 78 00:03:37,820 --> 00:03:35,610 loss of hydrogen to space leaving behind 79 00:03:39,680 --> 00:03:37,830 large amounts of oxygen which 80 00:03:41,900 --> 00:03:39,690 subsequently reacted saw planet it's 81 00:03:43,670 --> 00:03:41,910 gone today although there is a little 82 00:03:47,300 --> 00:03:43,680 photo chemical oxygen left over in the 83 00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:47,310 newsie naps here so if we're going to 84 00:03:51,530 --> 00:03:49,530 talk about oxygen as a bio signature we 85 00:03:53,449 --> 00:03:51,540 need again understand how it operates on 86 00:03:55,699 --> 00:03:53,459 the present earth and to do that we need 87 00:03:59,150 --> 00:03:55,709 to look at oxygen through time I showed 88 00:04:02,900 --> 00:03:59,160 this earlier in the intro mostly as a 89 00:04:05,509 --> 00:04:02,910 self-serving motion but if you look at 90 00:04:08,620 --> 00:04:05,519 oxygen before the gioi before the great 91 00:04:11,270 --> 00:04:08,630 oxidation event it is essentially zero 92 00:04:14,569 --> 00:04:11,280 the only sources of oxygen are going to 93 00:04:16,940 --> 00:04:14,579 be those transient or sources i 94 00:04:19,330 --> 00:04:16,950 mentioned before so co2 photolysis or 95 00:04:22,130 --> 00:04:19,340 lightning so there's very little here 96 00:04:24,260 --> 00:04:22,140 life however had different plans for the 97 00:04:26,780 --> 00:04:24,270 earth's atmosphere and so after the gioi 98 00:04:29,740 --> 00:04:26,790 oxygen is suggested to have jumped to 99 00:04:32,540 --> 00:04:29,750 between one and fifty percent of modern 100 00:04:34,340 --> 00:04:32,550 now there have been 101 00:04:36,410 --> 00:04:34,350 a number of recent suggestions that 102 00:04:39,140 --> 00:04:36,420 oxygen may have been lower so if you 103 00:04:41,060 --> 00:04:39,150 have read the 2014 klonoski at all paper 104 00:04:43,970 --> 00:04:41,070 in science they suggest that the 105 00:04:45,920 --> 00:04:43,980 proterozoic 02 so the oxygen level in 106 00:04:49,460 --> 00:04:45,930 here may have been in an order of 107 00:04:51,650 --> 00:04:49,470 magnitude or lower than an order of 108 00:04:54,290 --> 00:04:51,660 magnitude or more lower than the 109 00:05:00,380 --> 00:04:54,300 previous estimates for proterozoic 110 00:05:01,580 --> 00:05:00,390 oxygen and so what this means is that we 111 00:05:04,370 --> 00:05:01,590 could with a first generation 112 00:05:06,920 --> 00:05:04,380 terrestrial planet finder type telescope 113 00:05:09,470 --> 00:05:06,930 look for oxygen and may have detected it 114 00:05:12,530 --> 00:05:09,480 at the canonical values for proterozoic 115 00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:12,540 action or looked in the infrared for the 116 00:05:18,620 --> 00:05:16,410 ozone feature but really the earth could 117 00:05:20,990 --> 00:05:18,630 potentially be a planet without a 118 00:05:23,360 --> 00:05:21,000 significant bio signature for much of 119 00:05:29,000 --> 00:05:23,370 its history so this is bad news if we 120 00:05:31,310 --> 00:05:29,010 want to look for life elsewhere so this 121 00:05:33,560 --> 00:05:31,320 brings me to the crux of my question 122 00:05:36,140 --> 00:05:33,570 what is a false positive now as I 123 00:05:38,570 --> 00:05:36,150 mentioned before the proterozoic oxygen 124 00:05:41,600 --> 00:05:38,580 right after the first jump up was fairly 125 00:05:44,720 --> 00:05:41,610 low so it could be that in some 126 00:05:47,180 --> 00:05:44,730 situations the abiotic sources of oxygen 127 00:05:49,070 --> 00:05:47,190 actually produce more oxygen than the 128 00:05:52,520 --> 00:05:49,080 biotic sources did on the early Earth 129 00:05:57,190 --> 00:05:52,530 and so any abiotic oxygen in excess of 130 00:06:00,920 --> 00:05:59,600 and now I have to back away from this 131 00:06:03,260 --> 00:06:00,930 for a second and talk about some nuts 132 00:06:05,090 --> 00:06:03,270 and bolts just to give you guys a 133 00:06:06,850 --> 00:06:05,100 context for some of the things I will 134 00:06:09,860 --> 00:06:06,860 talk about towards the end of the talk 135 00:06:11,600 --> 00:06:09,870 when we talk about chemistry and a 136 00:06:13,460 --> 00:06:11,610 terrestrial planetary atmosphere what we 137 00:06:15,430 --> 00:06:13,470 really mean is that there's a whole slew 138 00:06:19,100 --> 00:06:15,440 of chemicals that are doing their own 139 00:06:21,320 --> 00:06:19,110 business in the atmosphere and in the 140 00:06:24,320 --> 00:06:21,330 case of co2 which I mentioned would be a 141 00:06:28,550 --> 00:06:24,330 big source of oxygen if these single 142 00:06:31,670 --> 00:06:28,560 oxygens could escape c 0 + 0 + m 143 00:06:34,370 --> 00:06:31,680 recombines those back into co2 or it 144 00:06:36,680 --> 00:06:34,380 would if that reaction wasn't spin 145 00:06:39,380 --> 00:06:36,690 forbidden and so what happens is you 146 00:06:41,840 --> 00:06:39,390 could build up CO and oh those o's could 147 00:06:43,640 --> 00:06:41,850 go off to make oxygen and we might see 148 00:06:44,770 --> 00:06:43,650 it that way however in the monitors 149 00:06:47,470 --> 00:06:44,780 atmosphere 150 00:06:50,379 --> 00:06:47,480 actually have these catalytic cycles 151 00:06:52,390 --> 00:06:50,389 that are fueled by the products of water 152 00:06:54,430 --> 00:06:52,400 vapor photolysis and so you can take CEO 153 00:06:56,080 --> 00:06:54,440 and the hydroxyl radical and through a 154 00:06:58,480 --> 00:06:56,090 bunch of other intermediate reactions 155 00:07:01,150 --> 00:06:58,490 you basically get a net result that is 156 00:07:03,220 --> 00:07:01,160 recombining CO and oh and this is very 157 00:07:06,129 --> 00:07:03,230 efficient in the prisoner its atmosphere 158 00:07:10,570 --> 00:07:06,139 that's why we get very little abiotic 02 159 00:07:12,340 --> 00:07:10,580 in the present atmosphere now this is 160 00:07:14,170 --> 00:07:12,350 particularly important if we start 161 00:07:16,800 --> 00:07:14,180 talking about other stars I know there's 162 00:07:20,860 --> 00:07:16,810 a lot of lines up here don't be scared 163 00:07:22,990 --> 00:07:20,870 the present Sun the solar spectrum is 164 00:07:26,530 --> 00:07:23,000 here in the black and you can see in 165 00:07:28,480 --> 00:07:26,540 this blow up that the the near you the 166 00:07:32,800 --> 00:07:28,490 far-uv which is these are in nanometers 167 00:07:35,140 --> 00:07:32,810 are is here and the far-uv is here the 168 00:07:38,080 --> 00:07:35,150 near-uv is here and there's actually a 169 00:07:40,510 --> 00:07:38,090 very different radiation environment for 170 00:07:43,960 --> 00:07:40,520 lower mass stars so you can see here GJ 171 00:07:45,850 --> 00:07:43,970 876 is an MSR middle M star and this is 172 00:07:48,190 --> 00:07:45,860 a dealio and gray which is another 173 00:07:49,540 --> 00:07:48,200 middle M star and those have very 174 00:07:52,030 --> 00:07:49,550 different radiation environments 175 00:07:53,680 --> 00:07:52,040 spanning this essentially a fairly 176 00:07:55,300 --> 00:07:53,690 arbitrary cutoff here so you can see 177 00:07:58,420 --> 00:07:55,310 that they have comparable amounts of 178 00:08:01,900 --> 00:07:58,430 what I'm going to call far UV and very 179 00:08:04,360 --> 00:08:01,910 different amounts of nuv up to two 180 00:08:06,370 --> 00:08:04,370 orders of magnitude less near-uv and 181 00:08:08,500 --> 00:08:06,380 this is particularly important when we 182 00:08:10,060 --> 00:08:08,510 look at the Potala sis cross-sections 183 00:08:11,170 --> 00:08:10,070 the absorption cross sections for some 184 00:08:13,719 --> 00:08:11,180 of the relevant species in the 185 00:08:16,630 --> 00:08:13,729 atmosphere so short word here we are 186 00:08:20,770 --> 00:08:16,640 getting still some fatalis asst of water 187 00:08:23,290 --> 00:08:20,780 vapor and co2 but long word than this so 188 00:08:25,120 --> 00:08:23,300 into the near-uv it's predominantly 189 00:08:27,520 --> 00:08:25,130 water vapor photolysis so that's that 190 00:08:32,409 --> 00:08:27,530 source of hydroxyl radical in an 191 00:08:35,100 --> 00:08:32,419 atmosphere now what that means is that 192 00:08:40,149 --> 00:08:35,110 i'm going to transition to a slide and 193 00:08:42,820 --> 00:08:40,159 wow sorry about that so the model in 194 00:08:44,260 --> 00:08:42,830 particular worries about the atmosphere 195 00:08:46,329 --> 00:08:44,270 as a whole and so we have to maintain 196 00:08:47,680 --> 00:08:46,339 global redox balance and I'm not going 197 00:08:49,450 --> 00:08:47,690 to get into the details because they're 198 00:08:51,700 --> 00:08:49,460 gory and kind of boring so I'm going to 199 00:08:53,560 --> 00:08:51,710 skip over them and say that if we assume 200 00:08:55,980 --> 00:08:53,570 that there are no geologic sinks for 201 00:08:57,150 --> 00:08:55,990 example on 100 million year time scales 202 00:09:00,030 --> 00:08:57,160 we 203 00:09:02,100 --> 00:09:00,040 can enforce atmospheric redox balance by 204 00:09:03,540 --> 00:09:02,110 assuming a return of reducing 205 00:09:06,030 --> 00:09:03,550 constituents to the atmosphere to 206 00:09:08,100 --> 00:09:06,040 balance the rain out of reducing and 207 00:09:09,840 --> 00:09:08,110 oxidizing species at the lower boundary 208 00:09:11,040 --> 00:09:09,850 that's a bunch of jumbled you don't have 209 00:09:14,790 --> 00:09:11,050 to worry about it if you have questions 210 00:09:18,900 --> 00:09:14,800 come see me the boundary conditions that 211 00:09:21,449 --> 00:09:18,910 are imposed are not tunable parameters 212 00:09:24,960 --> 00:09:21,459 they depend entirely on what you assume 213 00:09:27,360 --> 00:09:24,970 about the solid planet so these cases 214 00:09:30,019 --> 00:09:27,370 here where we're enforcing atmospheric 215 00:09:34,920 --> 00:09:30,029 redox balance that is in the context of 216 00:09:36,119 --> 00:09:34,930 global assumptions so I'm going to show 217 00:09:39,329 --> 00:09:36,129 you some results because that was kind 218 00:09:41,129 --> 00:09:39,339 of boring what we have here is I've 219 00:09:43,949 --> 00:09:41,139 taken the earth and I've plunked it 220 00:09:47,730 --> 00:09:43,959 around different types of stars and so 221 00:09:50,069 --> 00:09:47,740 for the Sun in the absence of life the 222 00:09:53,189 --> 00:09:50,079 oxygen mixing ratio at the surface is 223 00:09:55,319 --> 00:09:53,199 incredibly low it's our abiotic levels 224 00:09:58,829 --> 00:09:55,329 so like you saw before the gioi the 225 00:10:00,809 --> 00:09:58,839 oxygen was essentially zero for the f 226 00:10:02,999 --> 00:10:00,819 star which is slightly brighter than the 227 00:10:04,439 --> 00:10:03,009 Sun so the habitable zone moves out this 228 00:10:06,809 --> 00:10:04,449 terrestrial planet is nearly twice as 229 00:10:10,110 --> 00:10:06,819 far away from the Sun as the earth would 230 00:10:11,519 --> 00:10:10,120 be around the Sun the terrestrial planet 231 00:10:14,100 --> 00:10:11,529 on the f star is nearly twice as far 232 00:10:15,660 --> 00:10:14,110 away as it would be around the Sun but 233 00:10:17,490 --> 00:10:15,670 you can see that there's only slightly 234 00:10:19,499 --> 00:10:17,500 more oxygen in the upper atmosphere 235 00:10:22,559 --> 00:10:19,509 again that's from that Fatah lysis of 236 00:10:25,519 --> 00:10:22,569 co2 but again at the surface there's not 237 00:10:27,749 --> 00:10:25,529 so much what happens really is that 238 00:10:29,790 --> 00:10:27,759 around smaller stars where that 239 00:10:33,210 --> 00:10:29,800 radiation balance search the change is 240 00:10:34,679 --> 00:10:33,220 that we see we start to get for example 241 00:10:37,319 --> 00:10:34,689 with the K star which is slightly 242 00:10:38,990 --> 00:10:37,329 smaller than the Sun you start to see 243 00:10:41,490 --> 00:10:39,000 that the oxygen of the lower boundary 244 00:10:44,519 --> 00:10:41,500 irrespective of what you assume about 245 00:10:46,590 --> 00:10:44,529 the oxygen sinks the oxygen starts to 246 00:10:49,530 --> 00:10:46,600 build up and in the case of the M stars 247 00:10:51,749 --> 00:10:49,540 you get a range of values for oxygen 248 00:10:53,429 --> 00:10:51,759 based on your assumptions about the 249 00:10:55,710 --> 00:10:53,439 solid surface so in the worst-case 250 00:10:58,290 --> 00:10:55,720 scenario where we assume that there are 251 00:11:01,769 --> 00:10:58,300 no oxygen sinks which is likely 252 00:11:03,480 --> 00:11:01,779 unrealistic we get a few percent oxygen 253 00:11:06,629 --> 00:11:03,490 at the lower boundary which would be a 254 00:11:08,309 --> 00:11:06,639 detectable amount of oxygen in the cases 255 00:11:10,530 --> 00:11:08,319 where we assume that there is a large 256 00:11:12,480 --> 00:11:10,540 sink for oxidants 257 00:11:15,540 --> 00:11:12,490 for example the modern earth there's 258 00:11:17,760 --> 00:11:15,550 organic matter there's ferric iron 259 00:11:19,380 --> 00:11:17,770 deposition and banded iron formations so 260 00:11:21,690 --> 00:11:19,390 you could absorb a lot of that oxygen 261 00:11:23,790 --> 00:11:21,700 and actually draw it down to below that 262 00:11:27,600 --> 00:11:23,800 pollen offski at all false positive 263 00:11:30,060 --> 00:11:27,610 threshold I had suggested before and so 264 00:11:33,570 --> 00:11:30,070 to get back to this balance between the 265 00:11:38,460 --> 00:11:33,580 near you the far you the far-uv and the 266 00:11:41,340 --> 00:11:38,470 near-uv what we can say about what's 267 00:11:44,310 --> 00:11:41,350 driving the amount of oxygen is really 268 00:11:47,010 --> 00:11:44,320 this far UV to near-uv ratio and so if 269 00:11:49,980 --> 00:11:47,020 you plot these values for the stars 270 00:11:54,000 --> 00:11:49,990 based on their integrated fuv and 271 00:11:56,520 --> 00:11:54,010 near-uv fluxes you can see that the M 272 00:11:58,410 --> 00:11:56,530 stars plot way up here with the amount 273 00:12:02,520 --> 00:11:58,420 of oxygen being controlled by the amount 274 00:12:04,530 --> 00:12:02,530 of the ratio of f u v 2 nu V and the the 275 00:12:06,120 --> 00:12:04,540 g and the f star is down here and the K 276 00:12:08,610 --> 00:12:06,130 star sort of in the middle because it 277 00:12:11,510 --> 00:12:08,620 had a middling amount of oxygen but if 278 00:12:14,820 --> 00:12:11,520 you take the solar flux and you actually 279 00:12:16,920 --> 00:12:14,830 decrease the nu V so if you decrease the 280 00:12:18,960 --> 00:12:16,930 nu V we're coming over this way you can 281 00:12:22,740 --> 00:12:18,970 see that the oxygen actually builds up 282 00:12:26,400 --> 00:12:22,750 and and falls quite nicely along the 283 00:12:28,560 --> 00:12:26,410 other values for these stars and so in 284 00:12:32,580 --> 00:12:28,570 conclusion I'd like to suggest that 285 00:12:35,670 --> 00:12:32,590 there is little 02 or ozone around F and 286 00:12:37,080 --> 00:12:35,680 G type stars that there's a modest and 287 00:12:39,450 --> 00:12:37,090 potentially detectable amount of 02 288 00:12:43,500 --> 00:12:39,460 around k type stars and detectable 02 289 00:12:46,170 --> 00:12:43,510 around M stars in some cases EG if there 290 00:12:49,830 --> 00:12:46,180 are no surface sinks fro to and this is 291 00:12:51,980 --> 00:12:49,840 a lovely suite of spectra that Eddie 292 00:12:54,950 --> 00:12:51,990 schwieterman has put together from u-dub 293 00:12:58,080 --> 00:12:54,960 so not this you dub the other you dub 294 00:13:01,620 --> 00:12:58,090 and you can see that that for example 295 00:13:05,220 --> 00:13:01,630 that ozone feature in the UV is pretty 296 00:13:06,900 --> 00:13:05,230 strong for the M star and that oxygen 297 00:13:09,570 --> 00:13:06,910 feature at point seven and six microns 298 00:13:10,770 --> 00:13:09,580 is pretty strong too and so I'm going to 299 00:13:17,060 --> 00:13:10,780 leave that up I'm going to take 300 00:13:24,090 --> 00:13:22,050 questions for Sonny excellent i'm going 301 00:13:26,160 --> 00:13:24,100 to ask a naive question then so are you 302 00:13:28,530 --> 00:13:26,170 suggesting just that the takeaway is 303 00:13:30,660 --> 00:13:28,540 that if we have a detection around an 304 00:13:33,480 --> 00:13:30,670 effort a g-type star then that's 305 00:13:35,460 --> 00:13:33,490 probably fairly secure that it's biotic 306 00:13:37,200 --> 00:13:35,470 and not a biotic i would argue that if 307 00:13:39,810 --> 00:13:37,210 you do detect oxygen around an effort 308 00:13:42,750 --> 00:13:39,820 g-type star that it would likely be from 309 00:13:45,300 --> 00:13:42,760 a biological source okay of course the 310 00:13:46,860 --> 00:13:45,310 the gold standard biasing sure is oxygen 311 00:13:50,060 --> 00:13:46,870 in combination with some other reducing 312 00:13:54,030 --> 00:13:50,070 gas for example nitrous oxide there are 313 00:13:57,510 --> 00:13:54,040 very few and very small sources abiotic 314 00:14:02,100 --> 00:13:57,520 sources of n2o so those two together 315 00:14:03,570 --> 00:14:02,110 would be a good bio signature any other 316 00:14:07,110 --> 00:14:03,580 questions otherwise we're right on time